softwares.com

Clockwise vs Time To Pet

Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.

AI calendar assistant that creates focus time for teams.

Pet sitting and dog walking business software

The verdict

Both Clockwise and Time To Pet are credible scheduling tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.

Choose Clockwise if you want a lower starting price (free – $6.75/user/mo) and a free plan to start on. AI calendar assistant that creates focus time for teams.

Choose Time To Pet if you'd rather have a longer free trial (14 days), broader platform coverage and a higher overall rating (4.8/5). Pet sitting and dog walking business software

Clockwise vs Time To Pet: side by side

DimensionClockwiseTime To Pet
Starting priceFree – $6.75/user/moWinnerFrom $25/mo
Free planYesWinnerNo
Free trial14 daysWinner
Pricing modelFreemiumSubscription
Best forEngineering Teams, ManagersPet Sitting, Dog Walking
PlatformsWebWeb, Ios, AndroidWinner
Rating4.6/54.8/5Winner

Clockwise key facts

Vendor
Clockwise
Pricing
Freemium — Free – $6.75/user/mo
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web
Best for
Engineering Teams, Managers
Editor rating
4.6 / 5
Founded
2016
Headquarters
San Francisco, USA

Time To Pet key facts

Vendor
Time To Pet
Pricing
Subscription — From $25/mo
Free tier
Free trial (14 days)
Platforms
Web, Ios, Android
Best for
Pet Sitting, Dog Walking
Editor rating
4.8 / 5
Founded
2014
Headquarters
Austin, USA

Frequently asked questions

Is Clockwise better than Time To Pet?

Neither is universally better — Time To Pet edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.

Is Clockwise or Time To Pet cheaper?

Clockwise is the more affordable of the two to get started, at free – $6.75/user/mo. Clockwise starts at free – $6.75/user/mo; Time To Pet starts at from $25/mo.

Can Clockwise replace Time To Pet?

Yes for most teams — both are scheduling tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.