softwares.com

Cyberhaven vs ThreatLocker

Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.

Data detection and response (DDR)

Application allowlisting and zero trust endpoint control

The verdict

Both Cyberhaven and ThreatLocker are credible security privacy tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.

Cyberhaven — Data detection and response (DDR)

Choose ThreatLocker if you'd rather have a longer free trial (30 days) and a higher overall rating (4.8/5). Application allowlisting and zero trust endpoint control

Cyberhaven vs ThreatLocker: side by side

DimensionCyberhavenThreatLocker
Starting priceCustomCustom
Free planNoNo
Free trial30 daysWinner
Pricing modelSubscriptionSubscription
Best forEnterprise, Security TeamsSmb, Msp, It Teams
PlatformsWindows, Mac, Web, ApiWindows, Mac, Linux, Api
Rating4.6/54.8/5Winner

Cyberhaven key facts

Vendor
Cyberhaven
Pricing
Subscription — Custom
Free tier
No
Platforms
Windows, Mac, Web, Api
Best for
Enterprise, Security Teams
Editor rating
4.6 / 5
Founded
2016
Headquarters
Palo Alto, USA

ThreatLocker key facts

Vendor
ThreatLocker
Pricing
Subscription — Custom
Free tier
Free trial (30 days)
Platforms
Windows, Mac, Linux, Api
Best for
Smb, Msp, It Teams
Editor rating
4.8 / 5
Founded
2017
Headquarters
Orlando, USA

Frequently asked questions

Is Cyberhaven better than ThreatLocker?

Neither is universally better — ThreatLocker edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.

Is Cyberhaven or ThreatLocker cheaper?

Cyberhaven is the more affordable of the two to get started, at custom. Cyberhaven starts at custom; ThreatLocker starts at custom.

Can Cyberhaven replace ThreatLocker?

Yes for most teams — both are security privacy tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.