Fauna vs PostgreSQL
Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.
The world's most advanced open-source database.
The verdict
Both Fauna and PostgreSQL are credible databases tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.
Fauna - Distributed document-relational database delivered as an API
Choose PostgreSQL if you'd rather have broader platform coverage and a higher overall rating (4.8/5). The world's most advanced open-source database.
Fauna vs PostgreSQL: side by side
| Dimension | Fauna | PostgreSQL |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Open source |
| Best for | Developers, Startups | Developers, Everyone |
| Platforms | Api, Web | Self Hosted, Linux, Windows, MacWinner |
| Rating | 4.2/5 | 4.8/5Winner |
Fauna key facts
- Vendor
- Fauna
- Pricing
- Usage-based - Free
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Api, Web
- Best for
- Developers, Startups
- Editor rating
- 4.2 / 5
- Founded
- 2012
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, USA
PostgreSQL key facts
- Vendor
- PostgreSQL Global Dev Group
- Pricing
- Open source - Free
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Self Hosted, Linux, Windows, Mac
- Best for
- Developers, Everyone
- Editor rating
- 4.8 / 5
- Founded
- 1996
- Headquarters
- Open source
Frequently asked questions
Is Fauna better than PostgreSQL?
Neither is universally better - PostgreSQL edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.
Is Fauna or PostgreSQL cheaper?
Fauna is the more affordable of the two to get started, at free. Fauna starts at free; PostgreSQL starts at free.
Can Fauna replace PostgreSQL?
Yes for most teams - both are databases tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.