softwares.com

FullEnrich vs Lusha

Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.

Waterfall enrichment for emails and mobiles.

Contact and company data for prospecting.

The verdict

Both FullEnrich and Lusha are credible sales intelligence tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.

Choose FullEnrich if you want a higher overall rating (4.6/5). Waterfall enrichment for emails and mobiles.

Choose Lusha if you'd rather have a lower starting price (free – $49/user/mo) and a free plan to start on. Contact and company data for prospecting.

FullEnrich vs Lusha: side by side

DimensionFullEnrichLusha
Starting priceCustomFree – $49/user/moWinner
Free planNoYesWinner
Pricing modelUsage-basedFreemium
Best forRevops, Growth Teams, AgenciesSmb, Sales Teams, Recruiters
PlatformsWeb, ApiWeb, Api
Rating4.6/5Winner4.3/5

FullEnrich key facts

Vendor
FullEnrich
Pricing
Usage-based — Custom
Free tier
No
Platforms
Web, Api
Best for
Revops, Growth Teams, Agencies
Editor rating
4.6 / 5
Founded
2023
Headquarters
Paris, France

Lusha key facts

Vendor
Lusha
Pricing
Freemium — Free – $49/user/mo
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
Web, Api
Best for
Smb, Sales Teams, Recruiters
Editor rating
4.3 / 5
Founded
2016
Headquarters
Tel Aviv, Israel

Frequently asked questions

Is FullEnrich better than Lusha?

Neither is universally better — FullEnrich edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.

Is FullEnrich or Lusha cheaper?

Lusha is the more affordable of the two to get started, at free – $49/user/mo. FullEnrich starts at custom; Lusha starts at free – $49/user/mo.

Can FullEnrich replace Lusha?

Yes for most teams — both are sales intelligence tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.