softwares.com

LogRhythm vs ThreatLocker

Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.

SIEM and security operations platform

Application allowlisting and zero trust endpoint control

The verdict

Both LogRhythm and ThreatLocker are credible security privacy tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.

LogRhythm — SIEM and security operations platform

Choose ThreatLocker if you'd rather have a longer free trial (30 days) and a higher overall rating (4.8/5). Application allowlisting and zero trust endpoint control

LogRhythm vs ThreatLocker: side by side

DimensionLogRhythmThreatLocker
Starting priceCustomCustom
Free planNoNo
Free trial30 daysWinner
Pricing modelSubscriptionSubscription
Best forSmb, Enterprise, SocSmb, Msp, It Teams
PlatformsWeb, Self Hosted, ApiWindows, Mac, Linux, Api
Rating4.2/54.8/5Winner

LogRhythm key facts

Vendor
Exabeam (LogRhythm)
Pricing
Subscription — Custom
Free tier
No
Platforms
Web, Self Hosted, Api
Best for
Smb, Enterprise, Soc
Editor rating
4.2 / 5
Founded
2003
Headquarters
Boulder, USA

ThreatLocker key facts

Vendor
ThreatLocker
Pricing
Subscription — Custom
Free tier
Free trial (30 days)
Platforms
Windows, Mac, Linux, Api
Best for
Smb, Msp, It Teams
Editor rating
4.8 / 5
Founded
2017
Headquarters
Orlando, USA

Frequently asked questions

Is LogRhythm better than ThreatLocker?

Neither is universally better — ThreatLocker edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.

Is LogRhythm or ThreatLocker cheaper?

LogRhythm is the more affordable of the two to get started, at custom. LogRhythm starts at custom; ThreatLocker starts at custom.

Can LogRhythm replace ThreatLocker?

Yes for most teams — both are security privacy tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.