ScyllaDB vs Supabase
Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.
The verdict
Both ScyllaDB and Supabase are credible databases tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.
ScyllaDB — High-performance NoSQL database compatible with Cassandra
Supabase — The open-source Firebase alternative.
ScyllaDB vs Supabase: side by side
| Dimension | ScyllaDB | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | Free – $25/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | Open source | Freemium |
| Best for | Developers, Enterprises | Developers, Startups |
| Platforms | Self Hosted, Api | Web, Api, Self Hosted |
| Rating | 4.4/5 | 4.6/5 |
ScyllaDB key facts
- Vendor
- ScyllaDB
- Pricing
- Open source — Free
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Self Hosted, Api
- Best for
- Developers, Enterprises
- Editor rating
- 4.4 / 5
- Founded
- 2013
- Headquarters
- Sunnyvale, USA
Supabase key facts
- Vendor
- Supabase
- Pricing
- Freemium — Free – $25/mo
- Free tier
- Yes
- Platforms
- Web, Api, Self Hosted
- Best for
- Developers, Startups
- Editor rating
- 4.6 / 5
- Founded
- 2020
- Headquarters
- Remote
Frequently asked questions
Is ScyllaDB better than Supabase?
Neither is universally better — Supabase edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.
Is ScyllaDB or Supabase cheaper?
ScyllaDB is the more affordable of the two to get started, at free. ScyllaDB starts at free; Supabase starts at free – $25/mo.
Can ScyllaDB replace Supabase?
Yes for most teams — both are databases tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.