ThreatLocker vs Webroot
Updated June 2026 · A structured head-to-head comparison.
Application allowlisting and zero trust endpoint control
The verdict
Both ThreatLocker and Webroot are credible device management tools, and the right pick comes down to your priorities.
Choose ThreatLocker if you want a longer free trial (30 days) and a higher overall rating (4.8/5). Application allowlisting and zero trust endpoint control
Webroot — Lightweight cloud-based endpoint protection
ThreatLocker vs Webroot: side by side
| Dimension | ThreatLocker | Webroot |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom | Custom |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | 30 daysWinner | 14 days |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription |
| Best for | Smb, Msp, It Teams | Smb, Msp, Consumers |
| Platforms | Windows, Mac, Linux, Api | Windows, Mac, Ios, Android |
| Rating | 4.8/5Winner | 4.3/5 |
ThreatLocker key facts
- Vendor
- ThreatLocker
- Pricing
- Subscription — Custom
- Free tier
- Free trial (30 days)
- Platforms
- Windows, Mac, Linux, Api
- Best for
- Smb, Msp, It Teams
- Editor rating
- 4.8 / 5
- Founded
- 2017
- Headquarters
- Orlando, USA
Webroot key facts
- Vendor
- OpenText
- Pricing
- Subscription — Custom
- Free tier
- Free trial (14 days)
- Platforms
- Windows, Mac, Ios, Android
- Best for
- Smb, Msp, Consumers
- Editor rating
- 4.3 / 5
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- Broomfield, USA
Frequently asked questions
Is ThreatLocker better than Webroot?
Neither is universally better — ThreatLocker edges ahead on overall rating, but the best choice depends on price, platforms, and your use case. See the side-by-side table above.
Is ThreatLocker or Webroot cheaper?
ThreatLocker is the more affordable of the two to get started, at custom. ThreatLocker starts at custom; Webroot starts at custom.
Can ThreatLocker replace Webroot?
Yes for most teams — both are device management tools with heavily overlapping features. The main trade-offs are pricing and platform support, covered in the comparison above.